e-LawLines
  • ABOUT
    • Introduction to e-LawLines
    • Our Contributors
      • David P. Weiss
      • Jennifer Beasley
  • ARTICLES
    • Browse by date
    • Browse by practice area
    • Search all articles
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Practice Areas
    • Business / Corporate Law
      • Business / Corporate Law
      • Annual Meetings
      • Buy-Sell Agreements
      • Choice of Entity
      • Corporations
      • Divestitures
      • Employment Agreements
      • Limited Liability Companies
      • Non-Competition Agreements
      • Non-Profit Corporations
      • Registered Agent
      • Shareholder Disputes
      • Shareholder Rights and Issues
    • Commercial Law
    • Contract Law
      • Contract Law
      • Buy-Sell Agreements
      • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
      • Not-Competition Agreements
    • Employment Law
      • Employment Law
      • ADA
      • Affordable Care Act
      • Age Discrimination
      • Americans with Disabilities Act
      • Compliance and Risk Analysis
      • Employment Agreements
      • Equal Pay Act
      • ERISA Compliance
      • FMLA
      • Non-Competition Agreements
      • Pregnancy Discrimination
      • Sexual Harassment
      • Trade Secrets Law
      • Wage and Hour Law
      • Whistleblower Litigation and Public Policy Exception to At-Will Doctrine
    • Homeowner Associations
      • Homeowner Associations
      • Requirements for HOAs
      • Establishing HOAs
      • Running an Association
      • Condominium Associations
    • Litigation
    • Physicians & Healthcare
      • HIPAA and MACRA Are Changing, Are You Prepared?
    • Professional Licensing
    • Real Estate Law
    • Small Business Law
      • Small Business Law
      • Buy-Sell Agreements
      • Choice of Entity
      • Contract Law
      • Non-Competition Agreements
      • Registered Agent
      • Shareholder Disputes
      • Taxation
  • CONTACT
  • SUBSCRIBE
Select Page

Employment Contracts: The Fine Line Between a "Definite Statement of Duration" and a Mere "Salary Equation"

by e-LawLines | Sep 15, 2013 | Employment Law

On April 1, 2011, Michael R. Tettamble, Jr. (“Tettamble”) and TCSI-Transland, Inc. (“TCSI”), signed an employment contract which provided that Tettamble’s compensation would be “$1,250 per week for 52 weeks = $65,000.”...

High Court Ruling Confirms Who’s the Boss

by e-LawLines | Sep 5, 2013 | Employment Law, Litigation

The Supreme Court of the United States recently decided who constitutes a “supervisor” for the purpose of analyzing harassment claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court’s ruling in Vance v. Ball State University is significant...

Lying or Falsifying Documents Not ‘Misconduct’ for Purposes of Unemployment Unless Material to Employment

by e-LawLines | Aug 19, 2013 | Employment Law

The Missouri Court of Appeals recently held that an employee’s termination based upon lying or falsifying documents should not result in a denial of unemployment benefits based upon “misconduct connected with work” unless the falsification is material to the...

Police Chief’s Good Intentions Do Not Avoid FLSA Liability

by e-LawLines | Aug 16, 2013 | Employment Law

A Missouri federal court recently found that while a police chief attempted to better the department through new scheduling orders, his actions violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). As a result, the court awarded liquidated damages to record...

Girlfriend Buys New Car, Boyfriend Terminated, Legal Claim Denied

by e-LawLines | Aug 14, 2013 | Employment Law, Small Business Law

The Missouri Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of a Honda dealership in response to a wrongful-discharge lawsuit brought by a former sales manager. The dealership had a policy that employees and members of their household were prohibited from buying a new Honda from...

New Level of Proof Required for Retaliation Claims, says U.S. Supreme Court

by e-LawLines | Jul 17, 2013 | Employment Law

With the United States Supreme Court’s term having recently come to a close, the Court has issued an opinion concerning what an employee must prove to prevail in a retaliation lawsuit for discrimination based upon the protected classes of race, color, religion, sex...
« Older Entries
Next Entries »
Subscribe to e-LawLines >

e-Lawlines logo
e-LawLines is published by David P. Weiss, an attorney at law affiliated with Jenkins & Kling, P.C. His practice serves the entire St. Louis metropolitan region, including City of St. Louis, St. Louis, St. Charles, Jefferson, Washington, Franklin and Lincoln counties in Missouri, and Madison and St. Clair counties in Illinois. Learn more about David’s background.

David P. Weiss | 314.561.5078
[email protected]

Affiliations

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated Law Firm

cai_logo_black

  • ABOUT
  • ARTICLES
  • PRACTICE AREAS
  • CONTACT
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

© e-LawLines 2005-2025. All rights reserved.