Employment Law
We spend much of our lives in a workplace. Work is an important source of self worth, financial stability and the opportunity to utilize one’s talents and skills. Once an individual passes through his or her workplace door each day, there are important federal and state laws which pertain to the employer-employee relationship. We understand that while most people have a productive and satisfying career, there are times when the employment relationship needs to be documented, channeled, corrected, terminated, righted or resolved. We are available to consult and assist in all aspects of the employment relationship. having extensive experience in legal matters that involve addressing issues and rights in the workplace.
Our practice areas include:
- Affordable Care Act
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Compliance and Risk Analysis
- Covenants Not-to-Compete (Non-Competition Agreements)
- Employment Contracts
- Defense of employment discrimination involving age (Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967), race, color, sex, religion, national origin (Missouri Human Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964) or pregnancy
- Equal Pay Act
- ERISA Compliance
- Executive Employment Contracts
- Family and Medical Leave Act
- Physician Employment Agreements
- Reasonable Accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA)
- Severance Agreements
- Sexual Harassment
- Trade Secrets Law
- Union Labor Issues
- Wage and Hour (Fair Labor Standards Act)
- Whistleblower Litigation and Public Policy Exception
Employment Law Articles
Employment Contracts: The Fine Line Between a "Definite Statement of Duration" and a Mere "Salary Equation"
On April 1, 2011, Michael R. Tettamble, Jr. ("Tettamble") and TCSI-Transland, Inc. ("TCSI"), signed an employment contract which provided that Tettamble's compensation would be "$1,250 per week for 52 weeks = $65,000." Tettamble began employment with TCSI on April 4,...
High Court Ruling Confirms Who’s the Boss
The Supreme Court of the United States recently decided who constitutes a "supervisor" for the purpose of analyzing harassment claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court's ruling in Vance v. Ball State University is significant because it has...
Lying or Falsifying Documents Not ‘Misconduct’ for Purposes of Unemployment Unless Material to Employment
The Missouri Court of Appeals recently held that an employee’s termination based upon lying or falsifying documents should not result in a denial of unemployment benefits based upon “misconduct connected with work” unless the falsification is material to the...
Police Chief’s Good Intentions Do Not Avoid FLSA Liability
A Missouri federal court recently found that while a police chief attempted to better the department through new scheduling orders, his actions violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). As a result, the court awarded liquidated damages to record clerks who were...
